iSlate specs leaked..

The Nexus One might be on the tip of mobile industry’s tongue right now, but that hasn’t slowed the number of alleged Applet “iSlate” Tablet rumors coming to light. And, this latest Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) Tablet rumor is a doozy. The folks over at PhoneArena have gotten their hands on what purports to be a Apple internal documents that basically spells out the rumored iSlate’s specifications. The docs aren’t confirmed in any way at this point. But, if true, the not-yet-announced Apple iSlate will be a monster of a tablet.

The iSlate’s surprisingly impressive hardware specs are enough to tickle our geeky-bone, but there’s one specific spec that really gets our attention. According to the  supposed leaked documents, the iSlate will run something known as Mac OS X 10.7 Clouded Leopard. The new operating system is expected to be a touchscreen-friendly version of Mac OS X that uses a new widget-based homscreen. It’s not clear if Clouded Leopard will actually do any cloud computing.

As for the impressive specs we mentioned. Take a gander at Apple’s rumored specs for their tablet computer:

  • Precision aluminum unibody
  • 7.1-inch capacitive multi-touch touchscreen with some sort of “intelligent feedback” and an anti-fingerprint coating
  • 2.26Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo processor
  • 2GB DDR3 SDRAM
  • 120GB hard drive
  • Built-in projector
  • Built-in iSight camera
  • 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR
  • Mac OS X 10.7 Clouded Leopard

That’s one helluva spec-sheet, but there’s one big thing missing. There’s no mention of any 3G wireless connectivity. That’s a really important feature for a mobile device like the iSlate.

If any of this is true, we’ll have more information by Jan. 26th, when Apple is expected to make their tablet announcement.

No Comments

Skype beta calls on S60

Skype continued to expand its mobile footprint today with the release of a beta version of its offering for Symbian S60 3rd Edition phones, a move which could be a step toward Skype becoming the ubiquitous real-time communications platform CEO Josh Silverman envisions for the company. The release supports 17 different models and includes basic features such as free Skype-to-Skype calling, instant messaging, group conversations and the ability to call phones with Skype credits or via subscription.

The Luxembourg-based company — which has emerged from its spinout from eBay and its legal troubles with founders Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis settled — has been extending its mobile effort over the past year to support Windows Mobile devices, the iPhone and the Nokia N900. Skype Lite, a stripped-down version of the software, is available for a few dozen handsets. Skype said it will build on its Symbian support with the commercial launch of Skype for Symbian next year, giving it better access to the OS that — while slipping — remains the dominant smartphone platform worldwide.

, ,

No Comments

Mobile Phones Replacing Consumer Devices?

V3’s report on Gartner’s Jon Erensen

smartphone

smartphone’s session at Semicon West 2009 suggests…

“…market for smartphones is growing rapidly, and is cannibalising other sections of the consumer electronics market”

This has been the promise of Smartphones for a long time. I alsomentioned a trend in mobile development enquiries, of companies thinking of using S60 as a platform for vertical applications, as far back as September 2007.

However, multi-purpose devices never really reached the usability of a dedicated device. Part of the reason was because the phone UIs themselves weren’t that good. Applications based on them also inherited the implicit poor usability.

Today, Gartner might be correct. UIs are better now and phones much more capable. Maybe many vertical consumer products can be implemented on mobile phones in such as way that’s they are good enough to compete with dedicated consumer products. This creates new markets and new opportunities for mobile developers.

, , ,

No Comments

Enterprise Mobility In 2009

What’s In Store For Enterprise Mobility In 2009?

Forrester Research

In 2008, enterprise mobility initiatives were top priorities among companies of all sizes and many vertical markets, according to a new report by Michele Pelino, Senior Analyst, Forrester Research.

In the report, Predictions 2009: What’s In Store For Enterprise Mobility, Forrester reflects on trends in 2008, including widescale deployment of wireless networks, introduction of a wide range of new mobile devices, and increased interest in various types of mobile applications, and predicts what’s in store for 2009.

The report predicts that enterprises will continue to place a high priority on mobility initiatives primarily for productivity increases.

Among the predictions:

Mobility Remains A Top Priority — Despite The Down Economy

In 2008, Forrester’s survey results show that between 40% and 60% of enterprises in North America and Europe identified more mobility support to employees, implementation of fixed-mobile convergence (FMC) solutions, and formalization of a mobile strategy as critical priorities.1

The report predicts that it will similarly be a priority for 20092 because mobile applications and solutions let enterprises cut costs and improve employee productivity or worker efficiency.

iPhones get adopted by 10% of SMBs

The most widely used mobile operating systems within North America are BlackBerry and Windows Mobile, with European enterprises often supporting Symbian as well.

Now that the iPhone 3G supports Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync, push email, contacts, and calendar and can be remotely wiped if lost or stolen, it does indeed address key business mobility requirements.

As a result, Forrester predicts the iPhone will make a more significant dent in the enterprise mobility market in the year ahead, primarily among SMBs, which typically don’t have as strict

IT requirements as large enterprises or widespread line-of-business application deployments.

Enterprises Implement Tools To Address Mobility Security Issues

In a down economy, proprietary corporate data and employee information — such as account information and social security numbers — become even more valuable to identity theft criminals and nefarious entities who stand to reap great profits if they gain access to this information. This, plus the ever-increasing number of employees who are able to access corporate information via their mobile devies, will put added impetus on enterprises to ramp up their mobility security, according to the report.

Vendors ServeThe “Mobile Wannabes”

Earlier this year, Forrester identified a segment of workers it refers to as the “mobile wannabe” user segment. It predicts that this segment of workers will rise to nearly 10% by the end of 2009 and is expected to expand rapidly at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 46% through 2012.3

These mobile wannabes are mostly non-mobile workers today (e.g., executive assistants, human resource personnel, finance workers) who are usually at their desks but want to use their personal mobile devices for work-related activities.

According to the report, in 2009, vendors will develop products and services to address the needs of this rapidly growing enterprise mobile user segment. For example, the report predicts that device manufacturers will consider the dual personal and professional use of mobile devices as well as implications on device size, battery life, keyboard requirements, and form actors.

Likewise, mobile application developers and software vendors should create user-friendly, easy-to-use versions of email, calendaring, and corporate portal access applications to appeal to mobile wannabes and prepare to provide additional support and customer service for these users.

Consolidation Ahead In The Enterprise Mobility Vendor Landscape

The report describes the enterprise mobility vendor ecosystem as “fragmented” — particularly on the software side where it’s a free-for-all of incumbents, startups, and service companies offering mobile apps, device management, and security solutions.

The report notes that any of these vendors have focused on developing specific types of mobile applications or services — including @Road for field service applications or Sybase (iAnywhere) for mobile middleware, management, and security.

Forrester predicts continued consolidation in the vendor mobility landscape; for example, in late 2008, Antenna Software purchased Vettro to broaden its mobile application and solution expertise in the I.T. service management/help desk, transportation and logistics, local delivery and courier, utilities, and field service industries.

In 2009, Forrester predicts that systems integrators and mobile middleware vendors will snatch up smaller mobile application developers, such as Xora’s location-based field service solution, in order to expand their overall enterprise mobility service and solution capabilities and broaden their reach into enterprise organizations.

, , , ,

No Comments

Enterprise Mobility Matters

The Impact of Enterprise Mobility on Corporate GRC

Chess Some of you may know that I am now penning a column for the cool people over at FierceMobileIT. The first article I penned was with my friend David Goldschlag, CTO of Trust Digital where we talked about the need for enterprise app stores.

The latest article was posted earlier this week, but for those of you who may not be following FierceMobileIT, it’s on the topic of GRC: Governance, Risk and Compliance.  All I can say is, if your company (either as a user or vendor of mobility solutions) isn’t thinking about GRC, well you should start doing so.

A copy of the article is available after the jump.

 

Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) is by no means a new concept to organizations in the healthcare, financial or legal industries, or for the Fortune 1000 and publicly traded companies. For better or for worse, organizations must abide by a myriad of regulations.

In today’s economy, however, GRC is taking on a new level of importance in sectors that may not have thought it applied to them before. Strategy Analytics’ own research shows that organizations consider 45 percent of their workforce to be mobile–away from their home base more than 25 percent of the time –making GRC, literally, a moving target.

Before I talk about those issues, I thought it might help to provide a general definition of GRC. At the highest level, Governance, Risk and Compliance is a domain where organizations must ensure they operate in accordance with industry regulations, while balancing any internal or external “risks,” and ensure that they can govern themselves according to regulatory compliance, while better grasping “the unknown.” Let’s break down the three pieces:

  • Governance: Do you have policies and procedures in place to most efficiently and effectively understand how your business is run? Can you map your business processes, the supply chain, the dependencies and the bottle necks to understand who the key constituents (both in and out of your company) are? How do you go about documenting these processes to make sure you can prove your word to any one or any group who may challenge your business practices?
  • Risk: It can take on so many different meanings. There’s risk of trade secrets coming out as well as the risk of litigation from partners, competitors, trade organizations and government bodies. There’s also the risk of trade disputes, labor disputes, product quality control–never mind disaster recovery and/or business continuity. The key thing to remember here is that risk is omnipresent and that there is almost nothing at this point, in the business world that is “risk free.”
  • Compliance: HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley, OSHA, FDA and JCAHO, the list of acronyms goes on and on. This creates a potential nightmare for companies, or a wonderful business opportunity for the myriad consultants out there who work every day to ensure that your organization abides by industry/government regulations.

From the very basic bullets above, it’s easy to see how GRC practices and experts already have a formidable challenge before them, in terms of managing and securing information. However, the challenges above have historically been addressed in the context of immobile information. In the past, data and important files (for the most) part stayed in the four walls of the company’s office. There was no Internet. There were no laptops and no remote, home/office workers. There was no mobile professional. In other words, this isn’t your father’s GRC.

Enterprise mobility is a boon for that increasingly mobile workforce. Today’s knowledge worker can conveniently access his email, as well as other applications and information that reside behind a company firewall. With the growing interest in cloud-based solutions, that data need not be behind a company’s firewall. Regardless of where the information resides, a knowledge worker is already accustomed to accessing that data via his wireless laptop connection, and is increasingly expecting similar levels of convenience and functionality on his smartphone.

Speaking of smartphones, choices abound. While the BlackBerry remains a popular choice for consumers, new and recent market entrants such as the iPhone, Android and Palm’s webOS are providing an increasing number of consumer-friendly choices for people who are looking for one device to meet their personal and professional needs. This consumerization of enterprise mobility, particularly in the context of people expecting to have the ability to bring their individually-liable device into their work setting adds an order of magnitude to the complexities a CIO must wrestle with on a daily basis.

Chaos is the new order. While CIOs have historically been able to leverage the BlackBerry Enterprise Server to implement IT policies for their BlackBerry users, that is simply no longer enough because so few organizations today have a policy that allows only one mobile platform.

Historically, CIOs have decided that if an employee is to have a mobile device, it would be corporate liable and hence controlled by the organization. The consumerization of enterprise mobility, combined with the trend toward individually liable devices has changed the enterprise mobility landscape. CIOs must find the right balance for their organization that ensures that corporate data remains safe and secure at all times, while providing the workforce mobile tools that are not just flexible and convenient, but also meet their personal preferences, needs and persona. Unfortunately, there is no black or white answer. A complete lock down by the IT department will restrict user choice and flexibility. Conversely, allowing employees to do as they please will create chaos. Every organization must find its own shade of gray.

How is your organization managing this conundrum?

, , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Microsoft, Nokia Form Alliance to Rival RIM

Microsoft Corp and Nokia announced an alliance on Wednesday to bring business software to smartphones and counter the dominance of Research in Motion Ltd’s BlackBerry.

The alliance between the world’s largest software companyand cellphone maker means the latest versions of Microsoft’s Office applications, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint and messaging, will be available on a range of Nokia cellphones, which make up 45 percent of the global smartphone market. The two companies, at one time fierce rivals in the mobile telecommunications business, expect to offer Nokia phones running Office sometime next year. “This is giving some of our competitors – let’s spell it out, RIM – a run for their money,” said Nokia Executive Vice President Robert Andersson, in a telephone interview. “I don’t think BlackBerry has seen the kind of competition we can provide them now.” Research in Motion’s BlackBerry created the market for mobile e-mail, and its dominant position in the corporate sector, especially in North America, has protected it from Nokia’s attempts to crack the market in recent years. “RIM should be reasonably safe in the near-term because Nokia’s presence in the U.S. is relatively small,” said Neil Mawston from research firm Strategy Analytics. “Partnering more closely with Microsoft will help to raise Nokia’s profile in the U.S.”

The alliance also aims to counter Google Inc’s recent move into free online software, targeted at Microsoft’s business customers, and the growing popularity of Apple Inc’s iPhonedevice. “It’s clear that Nokia and Microsoft are both facing competitive challenges, most notably from Google,” said John Jackson, an analyst at wireless research firm CCS Insight. “It makes sense for these two companies to work together to see if they can pool their competitive strengths to try and counter some of this pressure.” The alliance means Microsoft’s new Office suite of applications could be available to a much wider audience than the users of Windows Mobile phones, which make up 9 percent of the smartphone market. “We see this as a great opportunity to deliver Office Mobile to 200 million Nokia smartphone customers,” said Takeshi Numoto, an executive at Microsoft’s Office business. Analysts said Microsoft is clearly looking at the largest possible audience with the Nokia deal. “The deal is a good win for Microsoft and it will surely now be hoping to upsell the Microsoft suite of operating systems into Nokia’s possible portfolios of smartphones, mobile Internet devices and netbooks over the next couple of years,” said Strategy Analytics’ Mawston. The two companies stressed that the new venture will not affect the future of Microsoft’s Windows Mobile and Nokia’s Symbian operating systems for smartphones. Executives said Nokia has no plans to make a Windows Mobile device. “We are extremely committed to Symbian,” said Andersson. “This is very clear. This is a multi-year collaboration building on Symbian. We are as committed as before, if not more,” he said.

, , ,

1 Comment

Aberdeen Group – Trends in Mobile Field Service – MobileDataforce Customer saves $1 Million in labor alone in first year of use.

The automation capabilities of our handheld solution have allowed us to cut labor costs by 10% to 15%. With our labor costs exceeding $1 million a month, this solution has saved us more than $1 million in labor alone in its first year of use. The solution also enables us to receive 85% of our billing data the same day the service is performed as opposed to waiting weeks for service paperwork under our old method. Faster access to data enables us to bill customers in a more timely fashion, which improves our cash flow.”  John Tricoli, President, Teph Seal

 

“Because human error has been eliminated from the process, we have been able to achieve 100% billing accuracy.” John Tricoli, President, Teph Seal

, ,

No Comments

A world without the browser

This morning I was contemplating the browser war, which has started again. IE vs. Firefox vs. Chrome vs. Safari. Nice fight to watch, something that takes me back to memory lane when Mosaic was my browser, when the fight was Netscape vs. Microsoft. You know, the browser is the center of our Internet experience. Everything goes around the browser. Google is built around the browser. Microsoft and Yahoo just agreed on a search deal around the browser. The browser is everything.

Then I got an epiphany.

The browser is going to disappear.

Whhhaaaaat? Are you crazy?

Ok, ok. Let me try to explain ;-) I saw the birth of the browser. I attended the third World Wide Web conference. I started the first web company in Italy. Once Tim Berners-Lee came up with the hypertext concept and created the idea of the web, I even thought about building a browser. I did. I still have some Tcl/Tk code somewhere. Others were much better and faster… The browser was the perfect visualizer for the web on a desktop. The hypertext meant links. Links need to be clicked. We had the mouse. We had big screens. We had a chair and a desk. Great match. Boom, the Internet was born.

Then came mobile.

I haven’t seen one single implementation of a browser on a mobile device that actually makes the experience good (not great). Do not tell me you like the iPhone browser. It is horrible. It is probably the best you can do on a small screen, with no mouse. Clicking is a pain. Zooming and panning is a super-pain. You click when you want to scroll. You yell.

If you can choose between browsing on your PC or on your iPhone, what would you choose?

Exactly.

Now let’s talk about Mobile Apps. They are built for interaction without a mouse. With one finger (the other hand holding the device). They are quick, immediate, intuitive, interactive.

If I have to choose between checking the weather on my PC or on my iPhone, what do I choose? The iPhone. One click. Done. I do not have to sit, open the browser, click and re-click and maybe even type my zip code. It is there when I need it.

Think about it. Mobile Apps can deliver a better experience then those on PC. Granted, I am excluding the productivity tools where you need a lot of typing. But those are few and you will need a keyboard, a desk and a chair. When you do not have to do a lot of typing, a mobile app becomes preferable.

Where is the world going? To mobile. The new Apple Tablet will blur the line even more. But it will be a mobile device for sure. An e-book reader + video player + music player + weather viewer + news viewer…. All with your fingers. All with little apps. All with no mouse. All with an App Store where you can find everything you need. The world is all going to mobile. We will spend more time without the mouse than with it.

This is the Internet era all over again. Back then, we had hundreds of small companies that started with the goal to build web sites. Now, every company wants an iPhone app. You can deliver more value with an app, than you can with a web site. More interactive, more personal, 24/7, in the hands of your customer, with push capabilities.

The result is that every company will have a mobile app, and hundreds of small companies will be created to support it. That you will “navigate” between companies moving from an app to another. That the search engine will not be on a browser, but in the app store (or in the search engine of the app stores, which someone should start developing fast…).

This is going to change the world as we know it. If the browser loses its centrality, ads will go somewhere else. The search engine will be way different. Someone has to invent a platform to link apps one to the other, of course, but the infrastructure is there. It is the engine of the browser itself, with its HTML, AJAX, CSS.

The browser will be swallowed inside the apps. We will have a world without the browser. The future is all of a sudden clear to me. Well, the browser fight looks kind of moot now…

, , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Microsoft is not re-branding Windows Mobile as Windows Phone

There are a number of reports on the internet today about Microsoft rebranding Windows Mobile as Windows Phone. While it’s easy to see why this confusion is spreading, it’s not actually the case.

Microsoft introduced the term Windows phone at Mobile World Congress as a way to make it easy for consumers to identify phones with Windows software and services on them. These Windows phones will run Windows Mobile 6.5, Windows Mobile 7, etc.. So, the operating system of the Windows phone will be Windows Mobile but the phone itself will be referred to as a Windows phone.

It looks like Microsoft is attempting to cut down on the confusion and make it easy for people to say, “yeah, I have a Windows phone” much like people say “I have an iPhone” today. I think the move makes sense but it’s interesting that mainstream media is creating confusion around something that Microsoft was actually trying to eliminate the confusion around.

Thanks to Sascha Segan and Mike Temporale for helping to clarify something that could have created a lot more confusion.

, , ,

No Comments